If some humans think there should be no violent thought, how do some defend violent speech? Why do some people extol freedom of speech rather than freedom of responsible speech? Why do some citizens remain silent while America barbarically fosters childhood poverty?
However, for brevity, I would like to ignore philosophy (meaning, as in Merriam-Webster, a discipline comprising as its core logic, aesthetics, ethics, metaphysics, and epistemology). I prefer to review a civic culture as understood in this blog: collaboration to discover the-objective-truth. The object is ideas a person can use for actual living rather than for speculating about better ways of civilization, socialization or arbitrary legalization. In a civic culture:
d. Silence when harm is known is civic immorality rather than freedom of speech.