Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Appreciating the primitive generations of Homo sapiens

 Writers who engage accuracy, precision, and depth accept that they must overcome personal prejudices if they will pursue the ineluctable truth. “Ineluctable” means – together -- not to be avoided, changed, or resisted. Among my prejudices is higher power, commonly referred to as church and state, or doctrine and discovery. But I think each person responds to physics and progeny, such as psychology.     

I thought some people were so righteous that I could not improve their opinions. But perhaps this chemical engineer ought to share some perspectives on Dr. Victor Davis Hanson’s 2025 speech at Hillsdale College; singjupost.com/transcript-of-victor-davis-hanson-2025-commencement-address-at-hillsdale-college/ . Please read Hanson’s speech.

My reaction

                First, Hillsdale notoriety seems to counter the NYT’s infamous “The 1619 Project”, published in 2019. It may have inspired President Trump’s 1776 Commission, September 2020. Hillsdale announced its “1776 Curriculum” on July 22, 2021. Replacing the worst presidency ever, Trump reinstated the 1776 Commission on January 25, 2025. It seems that presidential debate may end Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, developed during the recent 7 decades from Latin-American-Catholic-Marxism or Liberation Theology versus western tradition. The 1619 vs 1776 seems a gift to civic integrity, as it may inspire new perspectives on tradition -- even replace G.K. Chesterton’s “the democracy of the dead” with pursuit of statutory justice using the United States republic, a unique form of governance.

                Second, long-standing faith in theology seems arrogant toward whatever constrains the consequences of human choice. To understand benefits of physics empowers goodness. Goodness existed at the big bang, 13.7 billion years ago, ya. Awareness on earth began 3.8 billion ya when prokaryotes emerged. Wisdom began 200  thousand ya when Homo sapiens emerged with fast, high-capacity brains. Writing and grammar empowered wisdom-accumulation about 10 thousand ya. At least one civilization, Sumer, began recording wise collaboration for civic integrity 5500 ya. Competitive monotheism distracted integrity 3700 ya. Homo sapiens is above theism, without which there would be no atheism – only chosen goodness.

                Third, primitive-fear of mysterious phenomena may be resolved by research and discovery, yet rationalization and faith continue to compete for human attention/commitment. For example, the sun’s rays could kill humans on overexposure, so many civilizations, including Sumer, constructed sun deities and tried to bargain with them. But research informs us that the sun is a natural nuclear reactor. Similarly, all deities may be eliminated. Yet the pursuit of deity persists and became divisive when monotheism supplanted polytheism. Physics and it’s progeny including psychology offer bountiful unknowns to research, while imagination generates infinite mystery. Honest opinion eventually yields to integrity grounded in physics.

                I write opinion, because I do not know much of the ineluctable evidence. I restrict my opinion to what I experience or observe, and therefore do not comment on ideologies foreign to me, such as Confucianism. I think Hanson and Hillsdale favor a conservative view rather than engage the power, authority, and responsibility Homo sapiens possesses. Homo sapiens may research every discovery on earth and maintain a journal of achievement.

Hanson encouraged Bible readers rather than Homo sapiens

                Hanson overlooks Homo sapiens opportunity, by choosing satisfaction with Judeo-Christian values --- preferential use of books in the complete Bible. Its books originated less than 3700 ya in Mesopotamia, developed 2700 ya in Judea, added competition 1900 ya in Judea, enjoyed promotion 1600 ya in Rome, then suffered ancient competition 1400 ya in Mecca. Nevertheless, Homo sapiens survives.

Using exclusive words, Hanson confuses himself into neglect of the best of discovery older than 3700 years. For example, whereas the Code of Ur-Nammu, 4100 ya, prohibited the powerful from exploiting the weak, the Code of Hammurabi, 3700 ya, specified a welfare society. Subsequently, nations competed to skim welfare funds – church through philanthropy and state through taxation. When church and state partner, citizens are doubly subjugated, whether they “believe” or not.

Hanson subtly obfuscates Judeo-Christianity with words and phrases like, “heaven on earth perfection”, virtue, reverence, “judge not , , , “. Hanson juxtaposes 7-decades-old Marxist-Catholic Liberation Theology, citing “self-loathing”, “shame”, and “situational ethics”.  By limiting past interest at 3700 ya, Hanson overlooks that in  primitive cities like Nippur, wealthy students between adolescence and young adulthood attended school to learn cuneiform script and Sumerian and Akkadian languages; then agriculture, architectural design, astronomy, botany, engineering, history, literature, medicine, philosophy, religion, and zoology (worldhistory.org/article/2203/mesopotamian-education/).

                Hanson seems convinced “2,500 years of prior Western educators . . . in Athens, Rome, and Jerusalem [discounting Bagdad] first founded the disciplines and the boundaries of their all-encompassing knowledge”. He neglects the primitives who informed the ancients. Primitives employed polytheism to rationalize mysteries yet grounded “classical aspects of philosophy, literatures, language, history, mathematics, and science”. The recent 5500 of Homo sapiens’ 200,000 years provides modernity the opportunity to discover whatever constrains the consequences of choices. But the ancients failed their descendants by rationalizing competitive monotheism instead of researching the ineluctable evidence. We, the 2026 generation have the opportunity to collaborate for goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior.

The United States republic

Hanson invokes appreciation for “a system, a constitution, and an infrastructure that allowed [“us’] to start our own lives materially and safely far ahead”. But he does not recognize that the United States republic proffers intentions “to ourselves and our Posterity”. The intentions are stated in the preamble to the United States Constitution. I would love to read the interpretation that Hanson trusts-in and commits-to.

The United States republic is unique. The civic faction, We the People of the United States, pursues one vote for each qualified citizen. The civic faction empowers its city, county, state, and collectively, the nation. The civic faction accommodates pure-democracy in municipal, county, and state elections and prevents any-democracy in federal elections. It upholds State Constitutions that support the republic. It offers means for the engaged faction to amend the United States Constitution. The civic faction pursues good behavior “to ourselves and our Posterity”, hoping Homo sapiens benefits from goodness and statutory justice.

The civic faction, We the People of the United States, may, can, and ought to-reform modern education departments, in order to stop teaching students that they are born Homo-sapiens-sinners and that their purpose is to learn the skills the nation needs. The next generations of teachers could practice, facilitate, and encourage comprehension and intention to develop personal human being: goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior.

Conclusion


                I appreciate the churches who, during 7-8 decades of my life accommodated my curiosity enough for me to discover that this person always was unchurched yet pursued the goodness influenced by reports about an ancient political philosopher: Yeshua the Aramaic-speaking Judean of 2000 ya. It matters not to me how accurate, precise, and deep those reports are, because I also have ineluctable evidence discovered by the recent generations and living civic citizens, whether they know of Yeshua or not.

I hope my writing motivates Hanson to expand regard for the primitive generations without compromising his goodness, which I admire.

#USpreambler,#acivicpeople,#goodnesswhich

Copyright©2026 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.

Sunday, January 18, 2026

Sumerians 1: only humankind can choose to pursue good behavior on earth.

This is Item 2 of a series started on January 11, 2026.

Only Homo sapiens may and can choose to order life on earth; Genesis 1:26-28, originating 5500 years ago, ya. See https://grokipedia.com/page/Sumer.

Sumer civilization is recognized for inventing writing and grammar in Mesopotamia, about 10,000 years ago. Their language seems an isolate-; that is, not derived from a prior language. They were polytheists, and individual cities maintained, housed, and fed patron gods.

Sumer-mythology seemed to express that 2 goddesses and 4 gods --- Namma, Ninhursag, An, Ki, Enki, and Gestu --- created and activated existence. Namma as a primeval mother-goddess and Ninhursag as associated with fertility and creation. Enki is god of water, knowledge, crafts, art, intelligence, trickery, mischief, magic, fertility, virility, healing, and creation. In creation, perhaps Enki led the female and male team.

A sequence of Sumerian kings developed law codes from about 5500 ya until the Babylonians conquered them and Hammurabi published his improvement, about 3700 ya.

Before that, a Semitic-speaking family, Terah, son Abram and family with servants left Ur about 3900 ya. I speculate that a Semitic scribe wrote Genesis 1 through Genesis 2:3 to record prior-imagined creation. Then a second scribe wrote Genesis 2 to develop competitive thought under Yahweh/Hashem and patriarchy. I take the liberty to modify Genesis 1:26-28, in order to reflect my theory about Sumerian polytheism:

And [Enki] said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and they shall rule . . . over all the earth and over all [life on] earth." And Enki created man in His image; in the image of Enki He created him; male and female He created them. And Enki blessed them, and Enki said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and rule over [all species] on the earth."

Since the gods assigned to mankind, Homo sapiens, the responsibility to order life on earth, it is futile to assume another power will usurp human action. In other words, peace on earth may and can be chosen by humankind and no other entity. There is no hope beyond human goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior. To deny the power, authority, and responsibility to pursue goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior begs ruin.

To pray for power higher than good behavior seems arrogant.

Copyright©2026 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Yeshua 1: you can intend to perfect your person

 This is the first of a series to be posted on Facebook and on my blog, promotethepreamble.blogspot.com/.

Yeshua 1: Be perfect; Matthew 5:48, 30 CE

As a boy, after desire to choose goodness kicked in, sometime before age 7, I often heard, “Phil, accept Jesus as your lord and savior,” or “Jesus is my Lord”, or, on Sundays, “Accept God”. Recently the title “Christ” competes. Public collaboration is too brief to pursue civic meaning and church preserves doctrine, so goodness gets repressed. Often, writers relegate goodness to mystery, using the phrase “the good”. In my 9th decade, I work to discover and practice goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior.
In my 80th year, I happened to discover “Yeshua”. Pursuing personal curiosity facilitated the following conclusion: Yeshua, the uncelebrated person, lived 2000 years ago in Judea and discussed political philosophy in Galilee and Jerusalem. I try to discover Yeshua’s ancient influence by focusing on goodness evidenced in the complete Bible – New Testament (CJB and NKJV) and Old Testament (chabad.org/torah-texts/). The books therein record controversial constructs by mystery-entrepreneurs – writers who imagine powers mysteriously higher than good behavior.
Expanding advocacy for A Civic People of the United States, initiated in 2013, I now promote goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior, sometimes shortening to “goodnesswhich”. In the recent 2000 years, humankind discovered and pursues goodness Yeshua may not have taught. Therefore, many modern Homo sapiens practice modern goodness, often never having discovered Yeshua, and that seems OK.
We hear, “There’s nothing new under the sun”. That includes goodnesswhich; it existed before awareness emerged. I want to collaborate with contemporary people to benefit from Yeshua’s and other ancient thinkers’ messages that advocate good behavior.
Of all the messages I’ve encountered, the most impactful is this: Each Homos sapiens may and can choose to pursue perfect behavior, no matter how bad their present performance may be. From Yeshua, this notion comes as a command to a disobedient people: “Therefore, be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect”, Matthew 5:48. This command also means that individuals and groups may and can image the Father, which is declared in Genesis 1:26-28. The Bible offers evidence that Yeshua was aware of Genesis 1. I do not know the ineluctable truth and admit that Yeshua could have been there at the beginning. I don’t think so, but don’t know.
I plan this series to share suggestions of goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior by priorities I perceive, organized by the thinker’s name in their sequence. Thus, “Be perfect” is Yeshua 1. I will post this serial on Facebook and on my blog, https://promotethepreamble.blogspot.com/ in the folder “goodnesswhich”. As much as I can, I will be saying, “Consider Yeshua and others”, for example: Consider what Agathon thought and here’s why his thoughts are worthy. I hope to publish a new item each Sunday.
I copyright, not to constrain but to preserve my opportunity to express my ideas again or improve them. I write to invite fellow Homo sapiens to collaborate, in order to pursue the ineluctable truth.

Updated on 1/17/26 to improve clarity.

Copyright©2026 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.

Friday, November 14, 2025

A civic people has responsibility to license voting

 Commenting on Jeffrey A. Tucker’s article, “Why We Need Border Control”, updated November 4, 2025

theepochtimes.com/opinion/why-we-need-border-control-5935885

Fallacies I perceive:

1.       Beliefs/ideologies may trump civic integrity.

2.       Permanent residence inside the border entitles adults to vote.

3.       Politics is synonymous with policy.

4.       The United States electorate may ignore/defeat the republic’s provision for state-citizenship.

5.       “Experiment” expresses pursuit, intention, and commitment.

6.       Party competition constitutes governance.

7.       Citing Murray Rothbard justifies imposition of “democracy” to muddy an essay about “constitutional republics”.

Conclusion:

My hero Jeffrey Tucker’s expression of shock is grounded in hidden-opinion I do not share.
I found seven opinions I oppose. First, beliefs/ideologies may trump civic integrity, where “civic” means collaboration for responsible opportunity rather than development of civil norms among humankind. Second, intention to reside inside the border justifies the adult-citizen’s vote. Third, politics, or power, is synonymous with policy. Fourth, the popular vote may defeat the United States republic’s provision for state-citizenship; in other words, United States citizens don’t reserve the opportunity to choose and govern their locale within the nation and humankind. Fifth, “experiment” expresses intention “to ourselves and our Posterity” (where “Posterity” includes legal immigrants). Sixth, party competition constitutes governance. And seventh, citing another author justifies substituting “democracy” for “constitutional republic”.

I think there’s no excuse for a United States republican to advocate democracy, which is political chaos.

The civic faction may and can license voting, depending upon whether or not the fellow citizen comprehends, trusts-in, and owns commitment-to amenability of the preamble to the United States Constitution. The age of justifying citizens who assume they are animals/sinners, who habitually avoid, change, or resist civility, let alone civic integrity, is, or may be, over.

#USpreambler,#acivicpeople,#goodnesswhich

Copyright©2025 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.

Thursday, October 30, 2025

Difficult or nearly impossible for spiritual communities to join the civic faction

 

Review of:  https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/the-hidden-crisis-in-our-classrooms-why-education-without-character-is-failing-america-5926442

Phil’s essay:

I like the drift of this Falun-Gong associated attitude. But I think it misses the meme that distinguishes the civic faction in humankind’s civil debate.

It seems that physics, psychology, and mystery hold humankind (Homo sapiens for the recent 200,000 years) responsible and accountable for goodness that inspires good behavior.

Sumerian kings, starting about 5500 years ago wrote behavior codes with punishment for badness. Recently, civic citizens pursue legislated statutory-justice.

I think most fellow citizens are not aware of and therefore could not articulate the civic faction, yet a few comprehend independence and pursue civic integrity as they perceive it.

Our civic faction, We the People of the United States, is defined by the intentions stated in the preamble to the United States Constitution: integrity, justice, safety, strength, prosperity, and responsibility “in order to” pursue goodness “to ourselves and our Posterity”.

If personal religion does not discover the goodness that motivates good behavior, faith should be considered and perhaps improved.

Phil’s notes: (fei tian college wikipedia and https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Dragon_Springs)

 

1.       A peculiar contradiction

a.       Students with cellphone access to the world’s knowledge

                                                               i.      Yet disconnected and unhappy

                                                             ii.      Unqualified for college

b.       Graduates disengaged with their jobs

c.       Seems like a civility change

                                                               i.      Formal ability without virtue; goodness; capable but not upright

                                                             ii.      Trace to John Dewey’s utility rather than character formation

1.       values “socially constructed and relative”

2.       Colleges more business than educator

a.       Customers instead of students

b.       Endowment success and graduates’ salaries

c.       Job competence but no civic integrity

d.       No pursuit of truth, goodness, and excellence

e.       Inculcated thoughtful minds and meaningful life

3.       Student disconnect

a.       Can’t imaging ever using what they learn

b.       No perception of learning human being (verb)

c.       To pursue completion in maturity

                                                               i.      Duty, initiative, self-restraint, creativity

d.       Autonomy rather than license

                                                               i.      Personal goals and standards

                                                             ii.      Engage soul as well as intellect

4.       Human beings

a.       Civic integrity rather than spiritual nature

b.       Purpose higher than power, status, or materialism: goodness

c.       Professional success and resilience empowers civic confidence

d.       Pursue divinity: literature, history, philosophy, rhetoric, mathematics, science, and art

e.       both virtue and ability; character alongside capability

                                                               i.      Dona Bean’s work on “Character Counts”

                                                             ii.      Civic integrity more than common good”

f.        Self-governance rather than accumulation

5.       Improved education systems

a.       More than “training the workers we need” (Obama 2nd inauguration speech)

b.       Restore teacher nobility

c.       Shape the world as it should be.

                                                               i.      past generations left this opportunity to our generation

                                                             ii.      We may and can practice goodness that motivates good behavior.

Copyright©2025 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.

Friday, September 12, 2025

Discover Necessary Goodness That Motivates Good Behavior

Update: 9/28/25

A mimic:  What goodness brought together let no person divide.

Workshop to Discover Necessary Goodness That Motivates Good Behavior

Accepting authority, power, and responsibility perceived in primitive literature and imposed by physics

 

Civic citizens defend and preserve each other’s opportunity to pursue necessary goodness. Civic citizens do all they can to enhance children’s natural desire to discover and practice good behavior.

 

Seven seemingly ineluctable principles:

1.       Only the person may and can constrain chaos in her or his way of living

a.       Higher power – Church, state, or the partnership of the two, fails every individual

b.       Extant education fails

c.       Each person keeps beliefs humble to whatever constrains the consequences of choice.

2.       The civic person is humble to a mystery: necessary goodness at the recent edge of discovery

a.       Civic tradition continually yields to discovered goodness.

3.       Every human infant innately desires to pursue good behavior yet many children puzzle over erroneous social influences.

4.       Good behavior defines human being (the practice); inspires acquisition of wisdom.

5.       Civic citizens do all they can to aid children’s natural desire to comprehend and intend good behavior.

a.       Lesser species often neglect or abuse the children.

6.       A civic faction, We the People the People of the United States, pursues statutory justice* “to ourselves and our Posterity”. Posterity includes newborn-to-citizens and legal immigrants.

7.       A civic people amend the Constitution when injustice is discovered; through representatives, civic citizens legislate reform unto statutory justice.

*In statutory justice, injustice-discovery invokes legislative consideration to possibly amend the law, while maintaining obedience to the Constitution.

Preface to the workshop

Dream:  The civic people reform every education institution and function so as to encourage children to comprehend and intend to develop good behavior during a complete lifetime. Each child pursues this knowledge through adolescence, unto adulthood, into retirement, and unto death. Civic people mutually preserve each other’s opportunity to pursue goodness. They collaborate to accomplish what nations and religions, so far, failed: legislating and enforcing statutory justice when harm is discovered or imposed. In other words, a civic people pursue necessary goodness.

Adults choose to aid children. Adults pursue hopes and comfort yet practice civic integrity.

Colloquially, “civic integrity” displaces the “freedom and liberty” slogan: 1) Fellow citizens grant the Declaration of Independence (1774) takes its accurate status – colonial declaration of war against England, in order to clarify that the 13-states’ negotiated United States Constitution. Its ratification to 14 states, on December 15, 1791, marks the beginning of the pursuit of statutory justice to the USA’s 50 states. 2) Civic citizens do all they can to aid children in their natural desire for good behavior or, to the mirror, “I do all I can to aid children”. 3) Civic citizens listen to each other with appreciation, in order to establish mutual opportunities. 4) Civic citizens develop the law as statutory justice, in order to avoid and resist harm. 4) Responsibility to goodness prevails yet does not expect utopia. 5) Cultures learn to regard “scripture” as opinion about Homo sapiens.

Origin of this proposal: At Perkins Road Park, Baton Rouge, LA, in Summer 2025 Harry Dunn with Donovan Gray paused Phil’s walk-in-the-park to tell a squirrel story. Phil segued to the discovery of the mystery of necessary goodness, which ineluctably motivates a person to good behavior. Harry and Donovan happily pursued the ideas. The 3 people agreed to work together to present the story to listeners in Baton Rouge. Phil immediately began sharing with the two his opinions about Genesis 1:26-28, which we hereby dub “The Sumerian Perception” to humankind.

We happily cite the Bible as literature with opinions about Sumerian primitive-discovery of the good and essential because it impacts a majority of modern Homo sapiens. The Bible is opinion reported between 3700 years ago and 1900 ya. It records consequences of not benefitting from ineluctable truths that were discovered beforehand. For example, the Sumerians took responsibility for public welfare at least 5500 ya.

Delights among the Perkins-Road-Park-trio continued and are expected in the future. We request fellow citizens to aid our journey to fulfill our goal: impactful and positive presentation of the mystery of necessary goodness to the city.

Reform from Machiavellian-force to humble-goodness can only be done by individual people collaborating to good behavior: civic integrity. History has proved that power higher than a civic people renders chaos. Neither religion nor government intends to discover and pursue necessary goodness, and they have together brought the world to 2025-chaos. We three men perceive we are insufficient civic-citizens, and our first task is to add women to the team, either as participants or active advisors.

We intend to initiate a global movement grounded in necessary goodness, each element of which must be discovered as time unfolds. We have no intention to solicit money, as long as we perceive no benefit to the world’s children.

Immediate intention: Develop a Grass-Roots Presentation to Baton Rouge Inhabitants

We propose to develop this movement at Baton Rouge libraries then present it to Baton Rouge fellows, perhaps at a BREC facility or other low-cost venue, such as the stadium at Perkins Road Park. Perhaps the city will fund an event at Galvez Plaza. Perhaps millionaires will fund an event at Tiger Stadium, LSU.

Workshop approach:  Each month, we will present an essential topic for iteration with the participants, listening for civic improvements; hope to perceive improvements to the improvements then re-discuss. Continue this iterative process until all listeners perceive collaboration has approached the ineluctable* truth: conclusions from which mutual listeners cannot emerge. Then record the process and conclusions, knowing new input could restart iterations. We welcome discussion with groups who have not participated. We invite fellow citizens to suggest new topics to evidence humankind’s progress toward fulfilling the Sumerian Perception. For example, we presently have no presentation on leisure’s impact on goodness.

*Ineluctable: together, not to be avoided, changed, or resisted (Merriam-Webster online); think of a wrestling hold from which the opponent cannot emerge. European dictionaries tend to omit “changed” from the triune constraint.

We will establish and maintain active advisors with nomination by participants. At least for this first year, advice will be accepted or shelved by A Civic People of the United States, the Louisiana corporation founded in 2015.

After this initial year’s extendable meetings, continue the process from generation to generation – “to ourselves and our Posterity”, referring to the preamble to the United States Constitution. The quest for necessary goodness does not expect utopia.

Participation: Participants leave each meeting with consequences for consideration and possible improvement. Each person seeks opportunity to modify the path and direction of the work, in order to pursue humankind’s necessary goodness rather than a narrow view, such as submitting to higher power or mere force. Every participant’s contribution is precious to humankind.

If necessary, the current or a previous topic may delay the next planned topic. Consensus chooses such delay.

Knowledge: Presenters declare they can only express opinion. That is, much as they pursue it, they know they do not possess the ineluctable truth. Rather than cite references, they use key words so participants may independently search Online. The intention is to include essential happenings without attempting to fully explain. Our intention is to touch an overview from the Big Bank, 13.7 billion years ago to the world’s chaos in 2025, but not to explore the depths of knowledge, such as every detail of Sumerian law codes. Not knowing the ineluctable truth, we have no desire to persuade: civic citizens earn their opinion.

Venue:
Goodwood Library, Baton Rouge; 3rd Sundays, October 2025 through January, 2026, 3 PM until 6 PM excepting October 19 from 4:30 PM until 8:30 PM; second floor, room 2A, 2B, 2B, and 2A, respectively. Reservations for the rest of 2026 are to be made in November 2025.

 

1st Topic: Homo sapiens in charge of order

See Powerpoint presentation for October 19, 2025.

2nd topic:  Consequence of not accepting duty

The complete Bible reports the consequences when Biblical civilizations do not accept the Genesis-1 message, for whatever reason. The Bible is literature on par with the Sumerian codes of law and treaties with other governments.

Genesis 2:4 begins a saga of the G-d seeking a faction’s obedience, branching to factions who claim obedience is not essential.

1.       A king and priest, anointed to solve the dilemma, is prophesied in Zechariah 6.

2.       The faction was disobedient, so G-d flooded them out, beginning in Genesis 6.

3.       G-d made a blood covenant not to flood the people again in Genesis 8.

4.       Centuries later, Israel emerged after a covenant with Abraham in Genesis 12.

5.       Do 10 commandments in Exodus 20 abide Genesis 1? Advocate necessary goodness?

6.       A faction of Israel predicted a messiah in Isaiah 7 and 53.

7.       Israel alienated many peoples, including Arabs.

8.       Hebrews 9, dismissed by Israel, claims that Christ is the blood sacrifice for all believers, whether circumcised or not and whether obedient or not.

a.       Anyone who acknowledges Yeshua of Nazareth 2000 years ago is not a Jew, because Jews still wait for a Messiah or not.

b.       Christians project Yeshua onto Old Testament, scattered prophecy.

                                                               i.      “Jesus” is a miracle-working, western imposition onto Yeshua.

                                                             ii.      “Christ” is the executed then resurrected Yeshua to some, like Messiah to Jewish Christians, or Christ to Christians.

                                                           iii.      Christ is G-d.

Prophecy, miracles, and blood sacrifice confound the Bible’s influences to necessary goodness. The consequence is that differing believers exclude most civic people. The civic people among the various believers may and can reform use of the Bible story, in order to facilitate rather than prevent good behavior.

If Judeo-Christianity collaborated on discovering necessary goodness, and good behavior became evident, the rest of the world -- humankind -- might be on the way to order on earth according to Genesis 1:26-28’s Sumerian Perception.

It is important to limit belief in humility to whatever constrains the consequences of human choice.

(To be developed.)

3rd topic: Judeo-Christian values

Extensive New Testament reports of Yeshua, the actual person, influencing necessary goodness that accommodates the Sumerian Perception. Yeshua and Biblical constructs about miracles, blood sacrifice, and obedience influence 55% of the world’s population and is a controversial topic to 90% of the world’s Homo sapiens. Judeo-Christian values repress Yeshua’s influence to goodness with the miracles of “Jesus” and the “blood of Christ”. Focus on necessary goodness may and can resolve this worldwide dilemma. Maybe it’s better to drop the controversy and focus on goodness. (To be expanded.)

4th topic:   Homo sapiens’ quest for statutory justice

European or western political thought accommodates Yeshua-improved Sumerian Perception. Outline:

·         improving Sumerian law codes started 5500 years ago under polytheism headed by a goddess

·         A Semitic-speaking group left Ur to escape human sacrifice, 4000 ya, and wrote Genesis 1.

·         Genesis 2 then Moses’ law further subjugated women, 3400 ya

·         Cyrus Cylinder, 3000 ya, Persian abolition of slavery, and the Roman republic instead of kingdom

·         Papal bull authorizing Portugal to trade African slaves to the Americas, 1455

·         Magna Carta, 1512

·         John Locke, 1690

·         Edmund Burke, 1790

·         Thomas Paine; “African Slavery in America”, 1775

·         The Treaty of Pairs; ratified by Congress to 13 independent states in the USA, 1784

·         The negotiated US Constitution, ratified to 14 states December 15, 1791

·         Ralph Waldo Emerson; “Divinity School Address”, 1838; persons can pursue perfection

·         Marx, 1848

·         The civic faction of America ends slavery in America, 1865

·         Marcuse (1965) and Cone (1970)

·         WikiLeaks , 2006, documents reveal governments’ resistance against human responsibility

·         A Civic People of the United States, a Louisiana corporation, 2015

·         Workshop, “Discovering Necessary Goodness”, 2025

(To be developed.)

5th topic:   appreciating necessary goodness.

Humankind classify themselves according to harm they perpetrate or none:

1.       Civic citizens practice necessary goodness and influence civility, impacting,

a.       Passives and divines, who may awaken to civic duty,

b.       Dissidents and rebels to the law, who may choose to reform,

c.       Criminals, who harmed others or their property, who may be constrained and provided aid to reform, along with

d.       The wicked, who perversely abuse others, e.g., sex trafficking, and

e.       The evil, who perpetrate atrocities, such as microwaving babies, inviting annihilation.

Civic citizens collaborate to aid necessary governance with the other classes; influence, facilitate reform, constrain, avoid and resist, and annihilate, respectively. Categorizations are based on practice rather than values; intolerance of oppression. Practice follows comprehension and intention. Thus, a person born into a criminal community may accept his or her desire for good behavior and therefore pursue comprehension of necessary goodness.

(to be developed).

6th topic:  Achievements through science

(to be developed).

7th topic:   United States’ proposal

The United States Constitution improves western or European thought (to be developed).

8th topic:   Opportunities to amend the US Constitution respecting the Sumerian Perception; Machiavelli Chapter XI (to be developed including indications from the 1774 Congress’ development of the Declaration of Independence). First Amendment’s inadequacies; religion, speech, press. Majority jury votes, 9:3 in criminal trials.

9th topic:  How education departments repress children’s natural desire to acquire goodness. The decision to parent a child according to necessary goodness (to be developed including Kahlil Gibran’s “On Children”).

10th topic:  Wellness

Physical

                Diet

                Exercise

                Work

Psychological

Reading and writing

Motivation and inspiration

Civic integrity

11th topic:  Conclusion: Since the Sumerian Perception, humankind constructed “higher powers” – governments, churches, and ideologies – they brought the world to chaos. For 5500 years there have been billions of victims and oppressors, and humankind has not accepted the authority, power, and responsibility to provide order on earth. Despite the endless details that could distract fellow citizens from the overview, this workshop developed and intends to expand, most individuals may perceive that only the civic faction of the people can accept the duty to reform their associations so as to discover necessary goodness to humankind and encourage, facilitate, and empower good behavior. The civic faction, continuously pursuing good behavior, seems to be the ultimate constraint-on and hope-for humankind.

Proposals for the first city-wide presentation:  Necessary Goodness in a Confused World: how adults may and can aid children in the pursuit of good behavior during life. (to be developed).

12th topic:  Review and finalize the work.

13th topic:  Organize the first city-wide event (to be developed).

Flyer (attached)

Obsolete:

Do you feel your church (like-minded participants) should reform your religious institution toward pure goodness? Is necessary goodness an option?

Do you long to justify the claim that you do all you can to aid children’s natural desire for goodness?

If so, join our 12 month-project to develop a theory of necessary goodness that inspires and motivates good behavior. Our intention is to share the results with Baton Rouge in about two years, or in 2027.

Our audience is civic people -- Baton Rougeans who pursue good behavior as they understand it.

We need a steering committee to help design the 11 presentations for accurate, precise, and deep impact toward comprehending and reporting necessary goodness in human being (the practice).

Participants will, by mutually listening for shared concerns and empathy, direct the steering committee.

Please consider contributing to this work.

Volunteer registration (draft in process)

Active Advisors

                Family: Holly Beaver, Rebekah Beaver, Minta Marionneaux, memories with deceased loved ones

                Friends: Nicholas Ortego

Possible Help to Phil

https://nonprofitleadershiplab.com/free/5practices/?

Copyright©2025 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.

Find this document, updated from 9/12/25 using the search: "Discover Necessary Goodness"

Click on the first URL listed and go to the 9/12 post, currently the first one.