We urge every American to oppose Christian nationalism. As civic-citizens[1] who are privately Christian, our faith teaches us that everyone is created in the-God’s[2] image. Our adulthood commands us to appreciate[3] the living species and this world[4]. As Americans, we value our system of domestic-self-discipline[5] and the good that can be accomplished in our constitutional republic[6]. We civic-citizens[7] are concerned about a persistent threat to both U.S. religious communities and to our republic — the threat is Christian nationalism.
Christian nationalism seeks to merge factional-Christian[8]
and American identities, distorting both the Christian faiths and America’s
constitutional republic. Christian nationalism demands Christianity be
privileged by the State and implies that to be a good American, one must
be a national-Christian. It often overlaps with and provides cover for
white supremacy, racial subjugation, and religious submission. We reject
this damaging political ideology and invite the entity We the People of
the United States to join us in opposing this threat to our faiths[9]
and “to ourselves and our Posterity”, quoting the preamble.
As civic-citizens, believers are bound to the-God-mystery,
not by citizenship, but by faith, pursued in personal-privacy. Civic-citizens assert
that:
- People of all faiths and none have the right, self-necessity,
and justice to engage constructively in the public square.
- Patriotism does not require fellow-citizens to
minimize their religious convictions provided they observe and aid
civic-integrity and statutory-justice[10].
- One’s religious affiliation, or lack thereof, can and may
be irrelevant to one’s standing in the civic community. On the other
hand, spiritual inspiration to civic-integrity is appreciated by non-believing
fellow-citizens.
- Government should not prefer one religion over another
or religion over non-religion.
- Religious instruction is best left to adult-personal-privacy[11].
- America’s historic commitment to religious pluralism
enables faith communities to live in civic-harmony with one another
without sacrificing private hopes and comforts.
- Conflating religious doctrine with political authority
is tyranny. It oppresses the fellow-citizen’s opportunity to develop
humble-integrity. It lessens the churches’ opportunities to discover
the-ineluctable-truth[12] and
the state’s necessity to develop statutory-justice.
- Civic-citizens, that faction of We the People of the
United States that is defined by the preamble, can and may stand up to and
speak out against Christian nationalism, especially when it inspires acts
of violence and intimidation—including vandalism, bomb threats, arson,
hate crimes, and attacks on houses of spirituality—against religious
communities at home and abroad.
Whether citizens
worship at a church, mosque, synagogue, temple, or simply reserve
sufficient humility to the-God, America has no second-class faiths. All are
equal under the U.S. Constitution. As civic-citizens and Christians, we can and
may speak in one voice condemning Christian nationalism as a distortion
of Jesus’ message[13] and a threat to
American democracy.
We propose and request your aid to amend the First Amendment[14] to the United States Constitution so as to encourage and facilitate civic humble-integrity rather than Congressional-religious pride. With this reform, the entity We the People of the United States can and may separate church (a pursuit for adult-personal-privacy), from state (the necessary domestic and alien monopoly on coercion and force for justice). Thereby, Posterity, including legal immigrants will be empowered to hold elected and appointed officials in local, state, and national government to be of We the People of the United States rather than aliens to U.S. intentions.
Copyright©2022 by Phillip R. Beaver. All rights reserved.
Permission is hereby granted for the publication of all or portions of this
paper as long as this complete copyright notice is included.
[1]
“Civic-citizens” refers to members
of We the People of the United States who observe personal interpretations of
the domestic disciplines proffered by the 1787 U.S. Constitution. Civic-citizen
affirms the separation of church and state expressed by both the 1776
declaration of war for independence from England as well as the Sumerian political
philosophy expressed in Hebrew scholarship in Genesis 1:26-28. It asserts that
female& male-human-being can and may independently provide order&
prosperity to the living species and to the world. I reverse the gender-order
based on Jesus’ advice in Matthew 19:3-8: the man unites to the woman, and I
cannot explain the meaning.
[2] Accepting to ourselves
that, while the human being has the opportunity to develop the individual
power, the individual energy, and the individual authority (HIPEA) to choose humble-integrity
rather than egocentric arrogance, we propose “the-God” for civic discussion. We
intend to include the various theisms and non-theisms fellow-citizens
personally-pursue, in order to perfect their unique person according to the
responsible-happiness they perceive rather than to someone else’s vision for
them. “The-God” expresses humility in the hopes and comforts an individual’s
personal-God provides them in privacy. Human being (verb) assures each person’s
death.
[3] I choose “appreciate” rather than the traditional
“love” out of humility toward the other party, including the-God. “Love” is often unwanted and justifiably so. Appreciate is
more civic, provided “civic” refers to reliable human-connections more than to
municipal rules.
[4] My 2021 interpretation of
Genesis 1:26-28, a 5,500 year-old Sumerian political philosophy interpreted 2,500
years later by Hebrew scholars and neglected another 1,000 years later by
Christian writers.
[5] Little recognized and
less accepted, the 1787 U.S. Constitution, especially in its preamble, proffers
5 public self-disciplines “in order to” encourage& facilitate
responsible-human-independence (RHI) “to ourselves and our Posterity”. Religion
was and is excluded from the disciplines, in order to accept spiritual pursuits
as adult-personal-privacy. “Liberty” is a French fetish that too often is taken
as license to let fellow-citizens’ blood. Consider for example, the mob
violence U.S.-Democrat-run cities allowed if not nourished in 2020.
[6] Allowing postmodernism to
terminate the 1787 Constitution’s guarantee --- a republican form of government
--- is a death knell to the USA. To impose democracy is abdication to
Anglo-American tradition, or European enslavement of the U.S. person.
[7]
We the People of the United States as defined by
the preamble to the U.S. Constitution.
[8]
Christian doctrine has under 10 Bible canon and
each doctrine is subdivided, perhaps extensively. See Why
are there so many sects of Protestant Christianity? - TimesMojo and Just
How Many Protestant Denominations Are There?| National Catholic Register
(ncregister.com).
[9] As a Baptist, I married a
serenely-confident Louisiana-French Catholic woman and learned to cherish her
faith for her (and each of our children’s faiths for themselves) without
denying my faith for me. Also, I understand that there are Catholics who
pursue the-God regardless of the Church’s insistence on
a Transubstantiation-Trinity.
[10]
Statutory-justice is the pursuit of flawless
written-law and its enforcement and adjudication.
[11] Each viable-human-ova, the
single-cell embryo, the fetus, the delivered baby, and the child is due the
dignity and appreciation of a human person. An authentic woman cares for her
viable ova, perhaps 400 during her fertile years, plus any children for life.
The authentic man supports her and hers, in monogamy, for life.
[12] “Ineluctable”, known for
450 years and published in 1906 to modify both “truth” and “the . . . truth”,
is unfortunately unknown in 2022. It means, “not to be avoided, changed,
escaped, neglected, or resisted”. To lend precision& accuracy, I use
hyphens and invite the reader/listener not to disassemble the phrase
“the-ineluctable-truth”. I seek an improvement on this expression. People
compromise “truth” by debating its object.
[13] Jesus’ message is that
humankind can and may independently provide order and prosperity to living
species and to this world.
[14] We propose to amend the
First Amendment religion clauses to: Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or promoting the
free exercise thereof.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want your opinion and intend to respond.